AMCostaRica©

Published Monday, July 29, 2019












                               AMCostaRica©
Cocal021518.gif

                              AMCostaRica©
Cielo111218.gif




...


The dominant scientific opinion today is that the culprit for global warming is gas, including carbon dioxide and methane, both blamed on modern civilization. / A.M. Costa Rica wire services photo.


Four free films are a background
for climate change





By Jay Brodell


Public policy cannot be discussed today, particularly in Costa Rica, without consideration of climate change. That consideration is complicated because the topic is so complex.

Opinion polls in the United States have shown that climate is not a priority for voters. Still, some members of Congress have proposed dramatic changes in how Americans live in an effort to stem projected temperature increases.

The dominant scientific opinion today is that the culprit for global warming is gas, including carbon dioxide and methane, both blamed on modern civilization. Costa Rican officials have accepted this view and promise what they call a carbon-neutral society in the future.

For expats in Costa Rica and readers in the United States and elsewhere, the big question is how will politicians seek to flatten global warming. Some suggestions include a tax on carbon, reductions in the use of petroleum fuels and even changes in the daily diet. All these solutions are likely to be up close and personal.

The oceans and lake study center at the University of Costa Rica has planned a four-film series that is free and available for those who wish to increase their knowledge of this topic. The center is the Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología. The presentations begin Wednesday and run through Saturday at the Sala Gómez Miralles on Ninth Avenue and 11th street in San José. The building is the Costa Rican Cinematographic Production Center of the Ministry of Culture.

The four movies do not give a full view of the controversy about climate change. Former U.S. vice president Al Gore even wrote one. They seem to present a broad picture of one point of view, and those who are interested can seek out others. The center promises that discussions will follow the films with the participation of local experts.

The first movie on Wednesday is “Chasing Coral” by Jeff Orlowski, which has some spectacular underwater photography. The movie shows extensive damage to coral around the world and blames rising water temperatures. Showtime is 7 p.m.

Thursday the movie is “Before the Flood,” featuring Leonardo DiCaprio. Producers said that the carbon emissions attributed to making the film were offset through a voluntary carbon tax, something the film supports. The movie was made available for free on the internet before the U.S. 2016 general elections. Showtime also is at 7 p.m.

Two movies are scheduled for Saturday. The first is “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power,” based on a book, also by Gore. That is being shown at 4 p.m. A summary says that the movie chronicles efforts by Gore to fight climate change by urging foreign officials to sign the Paris climate accords and adopt renewable energies. Gore, because of his first movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” had been a lightning rod for criticism. That also is true of this film. According to the Washington Times, Climatologist Roy Spencer said: “The new movie and book are chock-full of bad science, bad policy, and factual errors.” Spencer, a meteorologist at the University of Alabama, is a leading skeptic of human-caused global warming.

The second movie on Saturday is at 7 p.m. It is “Blue,” directed by Karina Holden. The documentary reports on damage done to the oceans by plastic and factory fishing. This movie, too, features spectacular photography.

Data clearly shows that the oceans have risen perhaps as much as eight inches in the last century and that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased from 280 parts per million in pre-industrial times to about 410 parts per million now. Less clear are some of the indicators used to show the impact of global warming or even the impact of carbon dioxide. Counting polar bears is difficult, and teams doing so come up with very different numbers. Calculating arctic ice also is hard because the ice changes depending on the season and some scientists worry that coverage does not equal volume.

Skeptics of human causation generally cite fluctuations in the earth's orbit as a cause. Supporter cites the increase in carbon dioxide and current events, such as forest fires, flooding and hurricanes to support their views.

Mr. Brodell, founder and long-time editor of A.M. Costa Rica, can be reached at  jay@amcostarica.com


----------------------------
Do you believe  in  man-made climate change or do you think it is part of earth’s evolution? We would like to know your thoughts on this story. Send your comments to news@amcostarica.com
 










Booking.com







   AMCostaRica©


















Want to write or gripe
about Costa Rica?

Want to submit an event
to our calendar?

Send all the information news@amcostarica.com

Profile pictures are welcome too !

-No defamatory pieces will be accepted.
-We reserve the right to publish.




AMCostaRica©